Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

overclock geforce 4 mx 440


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#21 A+Net+MCP

A+Net+MCP

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts

Posted 29 February 2004 - 06:30 PM

3DMARK2003 tests the directX9 capabilities of the card and the MX440 is only a DX8 card with no DX9 capibility so that my be your problem. I get 4430 for mark03 & 10600 in 01se.
CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional

AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483 My Spec-V web page

#22 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 29 February 2004 - 09:48 PM

I have no idea what the cpu was.
by memory i got something like 900 3dmark 03 (with mx440)... correct me if that is completely impossible. thats what I remember it being anyway.

#23 A+Net+MCP

A+Net+MCP

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts

Posted 02 March 2004 - 03:14 AM

With that card any sub 1000 score wouldn't suprise me. It's not worth bench marking that card because you are just going to depress yourself when you see your score then you see other guys getting 4-5000+. Junk it and get a ATI 9800Pro. :rolleyes:
CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional

AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483 My Spec-V web page

#24 Guest__]DarkUFO_*

Guest__]DarkUFO_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 March 2004 - 08:44 PM

:huh: Dude's you guys dissapoint me especially "A+Net+MCP" for one thing the Geforce 4 MX440 hs directx 9 capabilities and mine is running at
Core Clock Frequency is running at 600 mhz
Memory Clock Frequency is running at 800mhz
which means its running almost as fast as a geforce 5900 which runs at 750mhz core /900mhz memory
and yes that is a geforce 4 mx440 all i have is one small fan blowing cool air on the gpu which is attached to the heatsink
and i get scores of :D 13600 on 3DMark2001 SE and 7653 on 3DMark03
So dont come with this crap that it has no directx 9 support or pixel and vertex shading ect because it has if it has the latest drivers it has the support for it

If it is overclockable it can reach the extremes remember that
,.;~_]DarkUFO[_~;.,

#25 A+Net+MCP

A+Net+MCP

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts

Posted 06 March 2004 - 01:41 AM

Any nVidia Gerforce3 or 4 are not DX9 complient, they are DX8 cards. Only the FX series are DX9. The 440's are not able to complete the 3Dmark2001 game 4. They are clocked at 200mhz MEM and 270 core. My 9700Pro is 325 core/310 mem. MX440 have no shader support. The 440 have 34Mil Triangles/sec the 9700pro has 325Mil Tri/sec. The 440 has a mem bandwidth of 6.4GB/s and 9700pro has 8.6GB/s memory bandwidth. These are facts and if you doubt it just ask MaximumPC Magazine. The 440 is an old cheapo card that is worth $20 now. :P :P :P
CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional

AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483 My Spec-V web page

#26 Guest_Blood Brother_*

Guest_Blood Brother_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 March 2004 - 04:00 AM

Hey 440 r not crap they r just Budjet cards whatever u guys tell about Radeon i still LOVE my 440 :P wait till nVidia puts new card on da table ;)

ATI SUCK :lol:

#27 A+Net+MCP

A+Net+MCP

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts

Posted 10 March 2004 - 05:53 AM

If you don't mind loosing a PCI slot and having your PC to sound like a hair dryer and loosing many DX9 benchmarks to ATI then go ahead. :rolleyes:
CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional

AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483 My Spec-V web page

#28 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 02 May 2004 - 10:22 AM

I just overcloked my mx 460 but it crashed and it wont go back to normal. What shall i do????/

#29 Guest_Lalope_*

Guest_Lalope_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 May 2004 - 08:03 AM

I used 3D turbo Experience for my MSI Ge Force4 Mx 440

Core 290/Memory 432, stable 3dMark2001SE result 6039 (4931 default settings)
So it works well !!! :D

#30 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 11 May 2004 - 02:57 PM

hEY GUYS , I HEAR YOUR DILEMMA'S AND I HAVE A Geforce 4 440 mx (sorry about caps). it is clocked at 250/400 and in 3d mark 2003 i managed to score 224 3d marks.

P4 1.6
256 mb ddr266

so i overclocked to 300 but the system crashed when i started 3d mark again. Right now i going to try just the memory.

#31 Guest_Choper_*

Guest_Choper_*
  • Guests

Posted 14 May 2004 - 07:02 AM

My GeForce 4 MX 440 is default clocked at 250/332, what`s the optimal overclockin, can someone help me

tnx in advance

#32 A+Net+MCP

A+Net+MCP

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts

Posted 15 May 2004 - 12:00 AM

Can we stop talking about 3 year old $20 video cards. How about something with some power in the $300+ range. :angry:
CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional

AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483 My Spec-V web page

#33 Guest_Guest_Danny_*

Guest_Guest_Danny_*
  • Guests

Posted 17 May 2004 - 06:34 AM

u idiot... screw your damn radeon 9700... i'm from romania... down here the money is short and it costs an arm and a leg to get one of those cards... so for now i'm stickin to overclocking... and i got pretty good result with my mx 440... so... if u don't mind.. get LOST :angry:

#34 slapnuts

slapnuts

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 06 June 2004 - 05:26 PM

Why don't you use PowerStrip? Or even better get a much better card like a 9600Pro or XT or a 9800. No speed increase can help the performance of that crappy card. No vertex & pixel shaders at any speed.

nice card you have to bad its on a 5$ cpu

#35 A+Net+MCP

A+Net+MCP

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 190 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 12:40 AM

Try $70 cdn.
CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional

AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483 My Spec-V web page

#36 alphaII

alphaII

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:08 PM

I don't know but I wouldn't wanna try a Canadian Card (X800) because nVidia just kick's ATi's ass by their new 6800 series.

By the way, I have had 2 ATI cards (ATI 7500, 8500) and both of them didn't work well and they broke. Thats why I am afraid of buying another ATI card. This has happened to my other friends as well.

However, I agree that ATi 9700 Pro is a performance card but it's not enough flexible to overclock it according to Maximum PC magazine.

Get a real Sillicon Valley borned card not a foreign card.

#37 Ravenhart

Ravenhart

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 08 July 2004 - 10:29 AM

I have an MSI GeForce MX440 [[email protected] & [email protected]], what are the optimal overclocking values? <_<

Intel Pentium 4
Asus P4B Motherboard
256MB SDRAM
Maxtor 6E040L0 40GB
MSI GeForce MX440 64MB DDR TV Out
ALS4000 SB
Teac 40x CDROM
LG 52x24x52 CDRW

#38 Guest_xXenXx_*

Guest_xXenXx_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 July 2004 - 02:13 PM

I just overcloked my mx 460 but it crashed and it wont go back to normal. What shall i do????/

Supposedly you hit control as your pc starts up.

#39 Guest_TheManTE85_*

Guest_TheManTE85_*
  • Guests

Posted 16 July 2004 - 08:41 PM

I have a GeForce4 MX440 PCI running on a PCI-X slot, which doesn't say much, just that it doesn't run at 33mhz, but 66mhz. The highest I've gotten the card to benchmark on 3DMark2001 is 5578 with 319mhz Core frequency and 425mhz RAM frequency. The cooling on the card is no problem, as I lapped the heatsink and put Artic Silver 5 on the NV17 core. I can't get the card to go over 320mhz Core frequency without it giving me artifacts. I was wondering if _]DarkUFO did the voltage modification on the card to get the higher Core frequency that he did, 600mhz. Let me know.




Intel SHG2. Dual Xeon 2.4ghz with HT. 512mb CL2 Infineon. Western Digital Special Edition 7200RPM 80gb. Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 7200RPM 120gb. 2 U160 HotSwap Drives.

#40 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 25 July 2004 - 11:53 PM

Geforce 4 MX440 64 DDR/64 bits @ 315/405 - 4900 points on 3D Mark 2001 se.