TheTechGuide Forum
General Category => Overclocking => Topic started by: Grizly on February 27, 2004, 03:06:54 PM
-
MY GeForce 4 440MX
Scores ni 3Dmark only 154
-
That's super low. When I had a ATI 9000PRO and my Athlon 1.6 I got 6600 in 3DMARK2001SE. Now I get 10600 with my 9700PRO.
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
-
[quote name=\'A\' date=\'Net+MCP+Feb 28 2004, 12:50 AM\']That's super low. When I had a ATI 9000PRO and my Athlon 1.6 I got 6600 in 3DMARK2001SE. Now I get 10600 with my 9700PRO.
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />[/quote]
STOP BRAGGING ABOUT YOUR RADEON!!! No one cares!!!
By the way, the reason you scored so low on 3dmark is because it tests Direct X 9 while your card is Direct X 8.
-
Are you using 3DMark03 or 3DMark2001? If you are using 3DMark03 then you will tend to get low scores because the GeForce4 MX440 can only support a limited amount of DirectX 9 processes, and the ones that it can support usually put a lot of stress on the card which lowers your 3DMark scores. Try using 3DMark2001 if you are using 3DMark03 and try basic settings with antialiasing, then try turning it off. More than likely you will get scores over 4000 if you turn antialiasing off because antialiasing really slows down the frame rates when on. I got my card up to 5578, but I overclocked my card to 319mhz core, 425mhz RAM.
Intel SHG2. Dual Xeons 2.4ghz with HT. 512mb CL2 PC2100 ECC Infineon. Western Digital Special Edition 7200RPM 80gb. Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 7200RPM 120gb. 2 U160 HotSwap Drives.
-
[quote name=\'A\' date=\'Net+MCP+Feb 28 2004, 12:50 AM\']That's super low. When I had a ATI 9000PRO and my Athlon 1.6 I got 6600 in 3DMARK2001SE. Now I get 10600 with my 9700PRO.
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />[/quote]
my x800pro is faster than your Suckass 9700pro...
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
12584 3d marks 03
Amd athlon 64 3800+
dual channel 2ggb pc 3200