Post by: bmbk on April 29, 2002, 11:51:32 PM
it;s a leadtek card, i wanted to overclock it, anyone here know much i can overclock the card,
can i overclock it to 300 mhz and 450 mhz. then the side band is disable for the card, anyway to enable it ?
Post by: personx on August 22, 2002, 01:15:38 AM
Post by: Anonymous on August 22, 2002, 01:22:54 AM
Post by: Guest on August 13, 2003, 01:05:56 PM
with the following speeds i got the following 3d mark score if anyone is interested.
core = 350
mem= 407
score = 5682
base score (no overclock) = 4984
(im not that well up on 3dmark , but i assume thats a good increase??)
on the following system
AMD xp 1900+ clocked to 2200+ @12.5*146
ga7dx+ motherboard
maxtor 80 gig 7200rpm
inno 3d gefore 4 400 128 meg ddr
512 meg 2100 ddr
Post by: Avi on November 19, 2003, 03:58:57 AM
can any1 help ?
Post by: A+Net+MCP on November 21, 2003, 02:47:05 AM
Post by: M Judge on November 26, 2003, 05:37:36 AM
Even though heatsink was cool because of the desk fan, the ram was quite warm and i would have doubts of long-term stability of this card at these settings, besides i hope to upgrade soon, but it would be interesting to strap a fast 80 or 92 mm fan with an adapter on it onto the card and see if it will still do it. I can send screenshots at request.
cheers
Post by: Guest on November 26, 2003, 05:40:18 AM
Post by: Neal on November 27, 2003, 07:09:58 AM
Using just the Winfast utility supplied with the card, I took the core to 325 and the mem to 450. No problems, no crashes, nothing. After running the card at these settings for a couple of months, I replaced the HSF with an old P3 server heatsink, attaching the card's old fan. I added my own ramsinks bought from an electronics store. The Leadtek MX440 ram is rated at 4 ns, which gives you a max frequency of 250 single channel, thus 500MHz DDR. Sweet! I took the mem up to 500 and the core to 375. Remember, the stock settings are 275 core and 405 mem! The card runs just fine. If you increase either the core or the mem, artifacts appear, otherwise no problems. The card has been running at these settings for four months now. No problems.
Leadtek is the way to go for OC'ing 3D cards - they rate their components way above spec.
Post by: BladeTR on December 18, 2003, 10:27:13 PM
Post by: N3ker on December 20, 2003, 05:47:20 PM
300 Core
500 RAM
it works good...
my system:
Amd Athlon Xp 3200+ @ Asus A7n8x Deluxe rev.2.xx 2x512 Infineon DDR 400 clock 2 .....
Post by: Guest on January 23, 2004, 10:10:44 AM
default core-275
mem-500(ddr 250)
I cranked it up to
core-372
mem-650(ddr 325)
seems to run stable so far, no extra cooling devices other than case fans.
played with the AGP drive strength in the bios though.
Post by: Guest on January 25, 2004, 01:45:07 PM
Got great results on 3dmark and ran morriwn elder scrolls at full antilasting and 1600x1200 res wit 76 fps
Post by: eric on January 30, 2004, 06:16:43 AM
Post by: A+Net+MCP on January 30, 2004, 04:20:41 PM
/tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' />
Post by: Márcio Martins on February 21, 2004, 05:46:05 PM
/wink.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\';)\' /> . This is a good low price card, not everyone has $$$ to put on a Geforce FX 5900 ultra.
Post by: A+Net+MCP on February 21, 2004, 09:46:07 PM
/tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' />
Post by: Guest on February 23, 2004, 09:10:54 PM
I have a leadtek mx440 and it gets 7000 at 340/510 up from 270/405.
I noticed a huge increase in performace putting the card in a barton 2500+ instead of a palomino 1600+.
the 1600+ only got 5800 at 350/515.
Post by: A+Net+MCP on February 28, 2004, 01:46:24 AM
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
Post by: Grizly on February 29, 2004, 02:41:56 PM
How can I make it faster?
Please help.
Post by: A+Net+MCP on February 29, 2004, 07:30:14 PM
Post by: Guest on February 29, 2004, 10:48:56 PM
by memory i got something like 900 3dmark 03 (with mx440)... correct me if that is completely impossible. thats what I remember it being anyway.
Post by: A+Net+MCP on March 02, 2004, 04:14:44 AM
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
Post by: _]DarkUFO on March 05, 2004, 09:44:08 PM
/huh.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':huh:\' /> Dude's you guys dissapoint me especially "A+Net+MCP" for one thing the Geforce 4 MX440 hs directx 9 capabilities and mine is running at Core Clock Frequency is running at 600 mhz
Memory Clock Frequency is running at 800mhz
which means its running almost as fast as a geforce 5900 which runs at 750mhz core /900mhz memory
and yes that is a geforce 4 mx440 all i have is one small fan blowing cool air on the gpu which is attached to the heatsink
and i get scores of
/biggrin.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':D\' /> 13600 on 3DMark2001 SE and 7653 on 3DMark03So dont come with this crap that it has no directx 9 support or pixel and vertex shading ect because it has if it has the latest drivers it has the support for it
If it is overclockable it can reach the extremes remember that
,.;~_]DarkUFO[_~;.,
Post by: A+Net+MCP on March 06, 2004, 02:41:59 AM
/tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' /> /tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' /> /tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' />
Post by: Blood Brother on March 09, 2004, 05:00:59 AM
/tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' /> wait till nVidia puts new card on da table /wink.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\';)\' /> ATI SUCK
/laugh.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':lol:\' />
Post by: A+Net+MCP on March 10, 2004, 06:53:06 AM
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
Post by: Guest on May 02, 2004, 11:22:25 AM
Post by: Lalope on May 09, 2004, 09:03:06 AM
Core 290/Memory 432, stable 3dMark2001SE result 6039 (4931 default settings)
So it works well !!!
/biggrin.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':D\' />
Post by: Guest on May 11, 2004, 03:57:47 PM
P4 1.6
256 mb ddr266
so i overclocked to 300 but the system crashed when i started 3d mark again. Right now i going to try just the memory.
Post by: Choper on May 14, 2004, 08:02:51 AM
tnx in advance
Post by: A+Net+MCP on May 15, 2004, 01:00:49 AM
/mad.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':angry:\' />
Post by: Guest_Danny on May 17, 2004, 07:34:11 AM
/mad.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':angry:\' />
Post by: slapnuts on June 06, 2004, 06:26:34 PM
nice card you have to bad its on a 5$ cpu
Post by: A+Net+MCP on June 08, 2004, 01:40:48 AM
Post by: alphaII on June 29, 2004, 09:08:20 PM
By the way, I have had 2 ATI cards (ATI 7500, 8500) and both of them didn't work well and they broke. Thats why I am afraid of buying another ATI card. This has happened to my other friends as well.
However, I agree that ATi 9700 Pro is a performance card but it's not enough flexible to overclock it according to Maximum PC magazine.
Get a real Sillicon Valley borned card not a foreign card.
Post by: Ravenhart on July 08, 2004, 11:29:25 AM
/dry.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\'<_<\' />Intel Pentium 4
Asus P4B Motherboard
256MB SDRAM
Maxtor 6E040L0 40GB
MSI GeForce MX440 64MB DDR TV Out
ALS4000 SB
Teac 40x CDROM
LG 52x24x52 CDRW
Post by: xXenXx on July 09, 2004, 03:13:44 PM
Supposedly you hit control as your pc starts up.
Post by: TheManTE85 on July 16, 2004, 09:41:28 PM
Intel SHG2. Dual Xeon 2.4ghz with HT. 512mb CL2 Infineon. Western Digital Special Edition 7200RPM 80gb. Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 7200RPM 120gb. 2 U160 HotSwap Drives.
Post by: Guest on July 26, 2004, 12:53:36 AM
Post by: Some 1 in luv on August 03, 2004, 06:12:48 PM
How can I make it faster?
Please help.[/quote]
You cant get a high score because a mx440 does only 1 test
/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
Post by: Dudes__Geof_ on August 06, 2004, 10:03:37 AM
i have a 440 and the mem is 332 mhz and the core is 275 mhz
i might try overclocking it
Post by: Anonymous on August 06, 2004, 08:03:05 PM
Post by: Jeremy on August 12, 2004, 02:38:18 AM
3dMark 2001 score was 8200.
And I havent tried clocking higher yet.
Post by: Guest on August 13, 2004, 07:03:10 PM
Post by: Guest on August 14, 2004, 10:43:54 AM
/biggrin.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':D\' />
Post by: kongwane on August 26, 2004, 05:26:16 PM
Hello, I also run a mx440 and i dont get any trouble, Make sure dat ur CPU is not out dated, closed all the applications dat u aint usind and make sure dat u have at least 256mb of ram
Post by: init on September 14, 2004, 12:41:13 PM
/ohmy.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':o\' /> For me, I wont buy any Geforce MX 440 due to it's poor performance and architecture. I would rather spend a few more bugs getting a Radeon 9200(128-bit) or 9550(128-bit). It's clear that NVIDIA losing ground to ATI in the MX range cards.
Post by: A+Net+MCP on September 18, 2004, 11:17:35 PM
Post by: Guest on September 22, 2004, 04:48:38 PM
You can go alot higher, but as soon as you start displaying 3D it will halt the system. I dont believe the 600/800 figures "]DarkUFO" gave would give any stability at all - if they are real.
- Seb
Post by: joel on October 05, 2004, 02:00:05 PM
Post by: Guest on October 10, 2004, 03:44:40 PM
on default setting I only got 5695.
Post by: Guest on October 10, 2004, 04:08:14 PM
I got another PC with Barton 2500+ and 9600 Pro. Cant wait to benchmark that rig. wait until my CoolerMaster Jet 7 arrive.
/biggrin.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':D\' />
Post by: Guest on October 12, 2004, 09:41:03 PM
/smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' /> not bad.Im getting 6826 in 3dmark 01 and 5736 on stock settings (275/333) so yeah /smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' /> heres my system:amd duron 1.8ghz oced to 2 ghz
512 mb ddr400 pc3200 ram
shuttle an35 ultra motherboard
40gb seagate hdrive
Post by: Guest on October 22, 2004, 05:33:29 PM
JAN (purkrabekEmail Removed)
Post by: Guest_danny on November 03, 2004, 10:09:22 AM
/tongue.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' /> ghetto, but works.
Post by: capitan cool on November 03, 2004, 10:14:20 AM
Post by: Undertaker on November 04, 2004, 02:50:01 PM
Post by: a_kafin on November 08, 2004, 05:02:19 AM
ECS KT600 A
2 x 256 BDDR-SDRAM PC 2700
Seagate 20 gb
Post by: KAFIN on November 08, 2004, 05:04:34 AM
ECS KT600 A
2 x 256 BDDR-SDRAM PC 2700
Seagate 20 gb
someone can help to increase my score my 3dmark2001 se??
Post by: LL on November 26, 2004, 03:26:14 PM
Check it out Here (http://\"http://www.freepalms.com/index.php?AFFID=4778\")
NOT A SCAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: gabe on November 28, 2004, 01:43:19 PM
It works fine but make shure you put a fan or a big heatsink if you alerady dont have one
/smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' /> /smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' />
Post by: Dac on December 07, 2004, 09:54:01 AM
how can i make my system score higher on 3DMark2001se..??!
because as i've seen from the others posts, i got a preety low crap score:
3000-3200 marks on 3dmark2001se!
my system is:
AMD Duron 1.1G @ 1.22G (110x10)
256 SDRAM
/sad.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':(\' />Syntax SV266A
/sad.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':(\' />Exair (cheep brand) MX440 260gpu/280mem @ 330gpu/330mem rock stable (with a 80mm cooler on it)
and i got a max of 3220 marks. preety deceptive for me.
i know that it is not much of an impressive system but i saw better results from the same video card here.
my main question is what is holding my system to score so low, what it is his bottleneck, what is a must to change to improve the marks?
thanks
Post by: Greg on December 08, 2004, 07:18:57 AM
My computer specs are:
P4 2.4
512 ddr 333 ram
40 and 80 gig hd
and a SiS motherboard.
the only cooling in my computer is 3 case fans.
Post by: Guest on December 10, 2004, 08:12:58 PM
Post by: Wes on December 30, 2004, 11:26:23 AM
i have a geforce 4 mx 440 SE 128 MB with AGP 2x/4X Manufacturer: MENTOR
On default is the card clocked at Core: 250 Memory: 333
I overclocked it:
Core: 331
Memory: 446
This al with no crashes and NO additional cooling.
When i overclock it to:
Core: 380
Memory: 500
I get a crash after 5 min of play a game.
So i think The Geforce 4 mx is a hell of a card to overclock.
Post by: A+Net+MCP on December 30, 2004, 02:39:12 PM
Post by: ACiD on January 03, 2005, 01:19:31 PM
My specs :
AMD Athlon XP3200+ @2.5GHz (10*250)
1024MB RAM PC3200
Xpertvision GeForce MX440 @ 400core / 440mem (originally 275 core / 300 mem)
All of this overclocking was done on a 450W PSU with air cooling only (4 case fans/gpu fan attached and ramsinks attatched)
Post by: A+Net+MCP on January 04, 2005, 05:34:10 AM
Post by: Guestman on March 03, 2005, 05:46:50 PM
i clocked my "budget" geforce 4 mx 440 agp 8x PCI card from the same 275core and 332mem clocks to:
450core and 630mem clocking on my
AMD athlon 2000+ (clocked at 1.8ghz)
1gb ddr ram
lol
Post by: A+Net+MCP on March 07, 2005, 02:03:05 AM
Post by: Gary on April 19, 2005, 02:56:03 PM
Post by: Guest_n00b_* on May 14, 2005, 10:09:19 AM
So i was wondering (haven't got a qlue about overclocking) how much can i clock it, without any problems, crashings etc. Which programs should i use?
I don't have any extra fans or smthg like that. The card is untouched.
Is it possible to clock it without any coolings?
Post by: Guest_n00b_* on May 14, 2005, 10:10:27 AM
So i was wondering (haven't got a qlue about overclocking) how much can i clock it, without any problems, crashings etc. Which programs should i use?
I don't have any extra fans or smthg like that. The card is untouched.
Is it possible to clock it without any coolings? If, how much?
Post by: noboundaries_au on May 15, 2005, 02:23:18 PM
/biggrin.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':D\' />
Post by: yerman13 on June 03, 2005, 01:40:28 PM
So i was wondering (haven't got a qlue about overclocking) how much can i clock it, without any problems, crashings etc. Which programs should i use?
I don't have any extra fans or smthg like that. The card is untouched.
Is it possible to clock it without any coolings? If, how much?
[post=\"40891\"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
[/quote]Hi, i have a some board (Chaintech GF4 MX440SE, 4x, 64 Mb/DDR/TVOut) and run @ 300/400 Mhz very well.
In my P4 Prescott 3.0, 512 DDR400, ATA 40Gb 7200 the 3DMark01 is 5000 3DMarks
Post by: Guest on July 24, 2005, 05:45:20 PM
/dry.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\'<_<\' /> Especially the Microsoft guy doesnt say\help anyone by saying get another card if they had the money/ if they want to pay €300 for a radeon 9800 pro they didnt came here in the first place so stfu plz about getting another card and blablabal cause ur not helping anyone there btw microsoft sux ass /blink.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':blink:\' /> Think before u post something man
Post by: dare_devil on July 25, 2005, 03:57:14 PM
[email protected]
/sad.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':(\' />
Post by: SpaceSquad on July 25, 2005, 05:34:35 PM
[email protected]
/sad.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':(\' />[post=\"50212\"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
[/quote]This is not possible on that card.
Post by: dare_devil on July 26, 2005, 06:20:27 AM
i have a book for this but there is nothing about how to do that ???!!!
/huh.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':huh:\' />
Post by: SpaceSquad on July 26, 2005, 11:44:39 PM
i have a book for this but there is nothing about how to do that ???!!!
/huh.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':huh:\' />[post=\"50300\"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
[/quote]I have never heard of using system RAM for seperate video card (AGP, PCI, PCI-X)...this will onlyu work on machines with integrated graphics, or laptops (integrated graphics). In those latter cases, you can enter your BIOS and change the amount of system RAM is allocated to video. If you game...turn it up to 64-128mb (depending on how much system RAM you have), if not, then turn it down to 32-64mb.
Post by: dare_devil on July 27, 2005, 06:05:00 PM
Your videocard does not support some required features (MIN_SIMULTANEOUS_TEX_4 ).
Your videocard pixel shader version « 0000 » is below the minimum requirements.
Your videocard vertex shader version « 0000 » is below the minimum requirements.
Post by: SpaceSquad on July 27, 2005, 10:53:56 PM
You can't just Overclock to a better shader.
What is your budget? Are you in the US?
I may be able to recommend a good card for you.
Post by: dare_devil on July 28, 2005, 06:56:59 AM
/blink.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':blink:\' />
Post by: dare_devil on July 28, 2005, 10:37:29 AM
But the fact is that this game can work on MX440
////\\\\
////III\\\\
III
III
CORECTION
Post by: Anon on August 07, 2005, 10:32:05 AM
/biggrin.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':D\' /> I managed to overclock mine to 350/510 (the defaults being 270/405) without any problems. These were the "safe" settings suggested by RivaTuner.
Post by: nefarius on September 27, 2005, 03:30:58 AM