TheTechGuide Forum
General Category => Frag Fest => Anti-Scammers Forum => Topic started by: JB Lee on October 08, 2007, 12:12:46 AM
-
If someone scammed, and there was absolute proof that they scammed...
and then they said they were hacked...and gave absolutely no proof that they were...just said it...
should they be banned?
how about if the story they are telling isnt adding up?
doesnt that make it even more likely that they are lying?
-
of course they should be banned
-
i would like to see all of your replies before i give the reason for this question
-
i think further action would be necessary....but if nothing else coms up then hes banned...even if he is innocent
-
Umm... I guess... There should be a way to prove if the person was hacked though :$... well most of the time there should be :\
-
well, in this case...the guy who was supposedly "hacked" said that he had a keylogger...so he changed his password, and then deleted the keylogger...
he specifically said he changed it first...and then deleted it...and even when asked he confirmed the order he did it...
which means the guy who keylogged him would have the new password...and yet he said he that he wasnt hacked still...
^that to me is proof that he wasnt hacked...
but since he said it was only his msn, there isnt a way to prove by IP or whatever..
------------
allanon says the only reason he isnt banned is because someone posted a picture of him acting like he was hacked...
but people are saying their isnt proof that you are hacked...wouldnt it make since that you would go around acting hacked...
-
yeah that AE m guy and the hacking stuff is really sticky, there like isnt any proof he was hacked really... them not acting like themselves isnt proof at all... if it were the other way around and they were proving it was him by him acting like himself i would say thats proof but it doesnt work this way....
this is a tough one, i would say give better proof he was hacked, until then he is banned because there is proof his msn scammed, but theres no proof it wasnt him on his msn... since its his msn proof it WAS him isnt needed...
maybe try to get him to slip up or offer that if he pays the people he wont be banned...
honestly this is kinda ridiculous because wouldnt the person have hacked his ttg as well? i mean come on they went straight for RS stuff and im sure they claimed to be AE m, said theyre trusted and what not... so it would have had to have been someone off forums
idk maybe dont tell him about that theory and ask where the keyloggers from... if he says some site then its bullshit but if its off someone over msn then there could be truth... but either way its really doubtful
-
im going to bump this...
he should be banned...
---------
think about it...anyone can just go scam 20m and say they were hacked...that doesnt make it anywhere close to true...
and just because someone says he wasnt acting himself (and if you read the convos of him not acting himself it looks a little....over dramatic) doesnt mean they were actually hacked...ESPECIALLY when he "wasnt acting himself" AFTER he was accused of not being hacked...
its complete bullshit...
there is no absolute proof either way (although the proof he wasnt hacked slightly outweighs the proof that he supposedly was)...and if there is no absolute proof either way, then the proof of him being hacked is basically nulled...
and let me remind you that there is 100% proof that his msn scammed...
so, if the proof of him being hacked is nulled...you are left with only the proof of him scamming...making it an OBVIOUS choice for him to be banned...