« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: MX 440 low preformance  (Read 2014 times)

Grizly

  • Guest
MX 440 low preformance
« on: February 27, 2004, 03:06:54 PM »
MY GeForce 4 440MX
Scores ni 3Dmark only 154
Logged

Offline A+Net+MCP

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.cardomain.com/id/lightspeedpc
MX 440 low preformance
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2004, 01:50:18 AM »
That's super low. When I had a ATI 9000PRO and my Athlon 1.6 I got 6600 in 3DMARK2001SE. Now I get 10600 with my 9700PRO. http://images.thetechguide.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />
Logged
[color=\"purple\"]CompTIA A+, Network+, MCP-XP Professional[/color]



[color=\"red\"]AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @1.53, Thermalright SLK700, Abit KT7A, 900MB PC133, WD 80G SE, Acomdata 160G Ext. S.B Audigy, Pioneer DVR-110, Yamaha 24/10/40, Sony 16X DVD, ATI 9700Pro A-I-W. Samsung 755DF. 3DMark01SE score:10335 3DMark03 score: 4483[/color] My Spec-V web page

Guest

  • Guest
MX 440 low preformance
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2004, 03:19:09 PM »
[quote name=\'A\' date=\'Net+MCP+Feb 28 2004, 12:50 AM\']That's super low. When I had a ATI 9000PRO and my Athlon 1.6 I got 6600 in 3DMARK2001SE. Now I get 10600 with my 9700PRO. http://images.thetechguide.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />[/quote]
 STOP BRAGGING ABOUT YOUR RADEON!!! No one cares!!!

By the way, the reason you scored so low on 3dmark is because it tests Direct X 9 while   your card is Direct X 8.
Logged

TheManTE85

  • Guest
MX 440 low preformance
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2004, 01:16:18 PM »
Are you using 3DMark03 or 3DMark2001? If you are using 3DMark03 then you will tend to get low scores because the GeForce4 MX440 can only support a limited amount of DirectX 9 processes, and the ones that it can support usually put a lot of stress on the card which lowers your 3DMark scores. Try using 3DMark2001 if you are using 3DMark03 and try basic settings with antialiasing, then try turning it off. More than likely you will get scores over 4000 if you turn antialiasing off because antialiasing really slows down the frame rates when on. I got my card up to 5578, but I overclocked my card to 319mhz core, 425mhz RAM.




Intel SHG2. Dual Xeons 2.4ghz with HT. 512mb CL2 PC2100 ECC Infineon. Western Digital Special Edition 7200RPM 80gb. Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 7200RPM 120gb. 2 U160 HotSwap Drives.
Logged

fast niggah on tha East

  • Guest
MX 440 low preformance
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2004, 06:24:37 PM »
[quote name=\'A\' date=\'Net+MCP+Feb 28 2004, 12:50 AM\']That's super low. When I had a ATI 9000PRO and my Athlon 1.6 I got 6600 in 3DMARK2001SE. Now I get 10600 with my 9700PRO. http://images.thetechguide.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />[/quote]
 my x800pro is faster than your Suckass 9700pro... http://images.thetechguide.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':rolleyes:\' />

12584  3d marks 03


Amd athlon 64 3800+
dual channel 2ggb pc 3200
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »