Author Topic: Celeron CPU's  (Read 422 times)

Offline cutie_pyie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Celeron CPU's
« on: November 17, 2005, 02:18:51 AM »
Hi Guys,
I thought that the definition of a Celeron processsor was that it didn't have any L2 cache. I now see ads for these processsors with up to 1GB? of L2 cache on them.
What has changed? And are Celeron CPu's now a worthwhile purchase?

Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Cindy

Offline SpaceSquad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://
Celeron CPU's
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2005, 07:50:35 PM »
not 1gb of L2 cache, maybe 1mb. Every computer microprocessor uses L2 cache. yes, even the Pentium MMX had l2 cache. Whoever told you celerons don't have l2 cache has no idea what they're talking about.

And no, the AMD Sempron is both cheaper and performs better than any celeron.

Offline i_and_identity

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://
Celeron CPU's
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2006, 12:05:19 AM »
Celerons are crap, get a sempron or maybe even an Athlon Xp!
Windows: A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.



For God's Sake, stop using Micro$oft's stuff - it has security like a piece of swiss cheese!



GET MOZILLA'S FIREFOX AND THUNDERBIRD